The phrase "doest violence to" is an archaic form of the verb "do violence to" and is used to describe an action that forcefully undermines or violates the natural order, principles, or concepts of something. It connotes a sense of excessive force, harm, or disruption caused to a particular object, system, or belief.
When an action "doest violence to" something, it implies a deliberate and forceful deviation from its intended purpose, function, or essence. It suggests an intentional disruption or violation of established norms, standards, or boundaries. This phrase is often used figuratively to illustrate the extent to which an action, idea, or behavior deviates from a desired or expected course, resulting in significant harm, distortion, or damage.
For example, one might say that a decision made by a government "doest violence to" the democratic principles it claims to uphold if it suppresses free speech or undermines the rights of its citizens. Similarly, an artist might argue that a critic's interpretation "doest violence to" their intended meaning, if it distorts or misrepresents their artistic vision.
In essence, "doest violence to" encapsulates an act of forceful violation or disruption that goes beyond mere disagreement or incongruity. It emphasizes the forceful impact and harm caused by an action or idea that drastically deviates from what is deemed acceptable, correct, or harmonious in a given context.
